中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d030b/d030bdacc4e3419972dbd41b99675feee4011e33" alt=""
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9cc7a/9cc7ac1ab56f291cd254f3b37ed620ba1d8f1c58" alt=""
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d45ee/d45eeabe9d41ee84ac2821d136715ffb88d431fb" alt=""
台舆论:兵役延长、军售不断 军事新动向或让台湾成为“抗中肉垫”****** 中新社台北12月31日电 在民进党当局宣布延长义务兵役至一年后,美国又宣布了最新一轮的对台军售。台媒舆论近日高度重视台当局军事动向,有评论认为,民进党承受不住美方压力,让台湾成为美国“抗中的肉垫”。 美国有意“指导”台湾延长兵役早已不是秘密。尽管当局一直矢口否认,随着兵役延长命令宣布,民进党当局所谓防务动向唯美国马首是瞻显露无遗。 专栏作者黄映溓在联合新闻网写道,开放进口美国“莱猪”、台积电先进制程赴美设厂等让民众危机感不断的事件,民进党都说“没有美国压力”;此次延长义务役时限,民进党同样宣称不是因为外部压力。这些话,民众信吗? 美方有关部门近日宣布的对台军售项目价值约1.8亿美元,这是美国政府一个月内的第二次对台军售。早在今年1月,台军方就证实计划向美方采购“火山”反战车快速布雷系统。在美方公布该案后,民进党当局防务主管部门声称,这一系统有助于提升台军所谓“不对称作战能力”。 台湾退役中将张延廷在中时新闻网撰文道,美国现政府已第八次对台军售。就战略层面,目前美国欲将台湾打造成一只“武装的刺猬、豪猪、毒蛙”,并和对岸进行激烈的焦土战。但两岸终究要长久走下去,因密切的经贸关系已不可能完全切割。一味在兵役制度或武器采购上缠绕,只是事倍功半、失去重心。 中国国民党智库安全组召集人、台立法机构前民意代表林郁方30日晚在政论节目上说,该反战车系统主要用于在滩岸上布雷,军事作用有限。政治人物真正的智慧是让战争不要爆发,而不是让台湾成为巷战、肉搏的战场,及美方的“抗中肉垫”。 《联合报》专栏“民意论坛”的文章表示,时至今日,台湾不寻求以和平方式化解两岸政治歧异,妄想用军事手段正面对决,无异于螳臂当车。政客自私自利,不负责任。但一旦战争爆发,战死的是年轻人、无辜的是百姓、逃跑的是政客。 台湾资深媒体人陈国祥在美丽岛电子报专栏发文称,越来越多的台湾民众感到战争阴云变浓。民进党的“抗中保台”诉求由于缺乏避免战争的具体方法,所以无法引起共鸣。许多年轻人已警觉,台湾陷入兵凶战危险境,就是执政者搞出来的局面。(完) 凤凰彩票地图 |